Saturday, 3 January 2015

PNAS paper: "Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping" by Siler, Lee and Bero

Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping


  1. Lisa Bero

PNAS December 22, 2014  

Abstract and paper at: 
"We found that editors and reviewers generally made good decisions regarding which manuscripts to promote and reject. However, many highly cited articles were surprisingly rejected. Our research suggests that evaluative strategies that increase the mean quality of published science may also increase the risk of rejecting unconventional or outstanding work."

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note that all comments are moderated to ensure there are no spam links added in comments. Thanks